CRR Case Summaries and Entity-specific Press Notices
The FRC publishes, on a quarterly basis, summaries of its findings from recently closed reviews that resulted in a substantive question to a company (‘Case Summaries’). In addition, it publishes the names of companies whose reviews were closed in the previous quarter without the need for a substantive question. No Case Summary is prepared for such reviews.
Case Summaries, which are available for cases closed in the quarter ending March 2021 onwards, are included in the table below. As, currently, the FRC is subject to existing legal restrictions on disclosing confidential information received from a company, the Case Summaries can only be disclosed with the company's consent. Where consent has been withheld by the company, that fact is disclosed in the table.
From March 2018 until March 2021, the FRC published the names of companies whose reviews were closed in the previous quarter but did not prepare Case Summaries. However, on an exceptional basis, specific cases may be publicised through entity-specific Press Notices, which can also be found in the table below.
The FRC’s reviews are based solely on the company’s annual report and accounts (or interim reports) and do not benefit from detailed knowledge of the company’s business or an understanding of the underlying transactions entered into. They are, however, conducted by staff of the FRC who have an understanding of the relevant legal and accounting framework. The FRC’s correspondence with the company provides no assurance that the annual report and accounts (or interim reports) are correct in all material respects; the FRC’s role is not to verify the information provided but to consider compliance with reporting requirements. The FRC’s correspondence is written on the basis that the FRC (which includes the FRC’s officers, employees and agents) accepts no liability for reliance on its letters or Case Summaries by the company or any third party, including but not limited to investors and shareholders.
Key
- Only a certain number of CRR’s reviews result in substantive questioning of the Board. Matters raised may cover questions of recognition, measurement and/or disclosure.
- CRR’s routine reviews of companies’ annual reports and accounts generally cover all parts over which the FRC has statutory powers (that is, strategic reports, directors’ reports and financial statements). Similarly, CRR’s routine reviews of companies’ interim reports will generally cover all information in that document. Limited scope reviews arise for a number of reasons, including those conducted when a company’s annual report and accounts or interim report are selected for thematic review or reviews that have been prompted by a complaint. In accordance with the FRC's Operating Procedures, for Corporate Reporting Review, CRR does not identify those companies whose reviews were prompted by a complaint.
- The FRC may ask a company to refer to its exchanges with CRR when the company makes a change to a significant aspect of its annual report and accounts or interim report in response to a review.
- Case closed after 1 January 2021 but performed under operating procedures that did not allow for the publication of Case Summaries.
- From the quarter ended June 2023, the FRC started identifying the auditor of the annual report and accounts, or the audit firm that issued a review report on the interim report, that was the subject of the CRR review. This information was also back-dated for closed cases publicised from the quarter ended September 2022. Cases marked N/A relate to those published prior to September 2022 or interim reviews that did not have a review opinion.’
Cases
CRR Case Summaries and Entity-specific Press Notices (Excel version)
| Entity | Hogan Lovells International LLP |
|---|---|
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 December 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Deloitte LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Holcim UK Limited |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 December 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Ernst & Young LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | IG Group Holdings plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 May 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Inspired PLC |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 December 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Limited |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | RSM UK Audit LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
Revenue recognition We asked the company to explain, with reference to the requirements in IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’, the basis for recognising 10% of revenue at the start of the contract for the assurance division’s mid-market clients. We closed our enquiries after the company explained that the amounts involved were not material. We also asked the company about the nature of the share of savings revenue and how the requirements in relation to estimating variable consideration had been applied. The company provided a satisfactory response and agreed to provide additional disclosure explaining the accounting for variable consideration in the future. |
| Entity | Jet2 plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 March 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Limited |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | KPMG LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Jubilee Metals Group PLC |
| Balance Sheet Date | 30 June 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Crowe U.K. LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
Provisional pricing arrangements We asked the company to explain the accounting policy for provisional pricing arrangements. We closed the matter after the company explained that the typical adjustment period was short and the adjustments were not material. The company agreed to enhance the disclosure of the accounting policy for these arrangements in future annual reports and accounts. Trade finance facilities We asked for more information about the company’s metal trade finance facilities and the accounting policy adopted. The company explained the key terms of the facilities, clarifying that settlement is mostly in copper concentrate, as well as the accounting policy applied. The company agreed to enhance the disclosure of the facilities, including separately presenting the facilities balances within the trade and other payables note, in future annual reports and accounts. Intangible assets We asked the company to clarify the difference between the categories of intangible assets presented and explain the basis for the conclusion that each of the costs meet the criteria to be capitalised in IAS 38, ‘Intangible Assets’. The company provided satisfactory explanations and agreed to enhance the disclosure of each category in future annual reports and accounts. We also asked the company to explain the basis for the conclusion that no amortisation should be provided for processing rights in the current or prior year. The company explained that these assets will be amortised on a unit of production basis but as this has not yet commenced, they are instead subject to annual impairment reviews. The company agreed to enhance the disclosure of the amortisation policy in future annual reports and accounts. Deferred tax We asked the company to confirm the nature of certain movements in the reconciliation of deferred tax. The company provided satisfactory explanations and agreed to amend the descriptions in future annual reports and accounts. Investment in New Plats (Tjate) Proprietary Limited (New Plats) We sought clarification of the basis on which the company concluded it controlled New Plats despite holding less than 50% of the ordinary issued capital. The company explained that it has beneficial and controlling rights over the remaining capital and agreed to enhance the disclosure of these arrangements in future annual reports and accounts. |
| Entity | Kainos Group PLC |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 March 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | KPMG Ireland |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
Share buyback programme We asked the company to explain the differing accounting treatment applied to two apparently similar share buyback agreements in its annual report and accounts and subsequent interim report. The company clarified that its contractual rights and obligations differed at the two reporting dates, affecting whether a financial liability should be recognised. Research and Development Expenditure Credit (RDEC) income We also sought clarification of how RDEC income had been reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The company identified that movements in the RDEC balance were included within working capital movements in the consolidated cash flow statement. The company proposed to amend this presentation by adding back the relevant amount in the reconciliation between profit for the year and operating cash flows before working capital in the 2026 annual report and accounts, with prior year comparatives restated accordingly. |
| Entity | Knights Group Holdings plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 30 April 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | RSM UK Audit LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Lidl Great Britain Limited |
| Balance Sheet Date | 28 February 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Ernst & Young LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Literacy Capital plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 December 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Limited |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Forvis Mazars LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
This company was selected as part of our thematic review of investment trusts, venture capital trusts and other closed-ended entities and, as such, only disclosures included in the scope of the thematic were reviewed. Refinancing of unlisted investment The notes to the financial statements described the refinancing of an unlisted investment during the year that was structured as a sale of the business followed by its repurchase and revaluation, which resulted in the presentation of both a realised loss and an unrealised gain. We asked the company to provide additional details about the refinancing and to explain the accounting treatment applied under IFRS 9, ‘Financial Instruments’, and how the realised and unrealised elements of the transaction had been determined. We also asked the company to provide an analysis of the total gains and losses presented in the statement of comprehensive income, and the extent to which these items had been explained in the strategic report. The company provided details of the refinancing transaction and the rationale for the accounting applied. It agreed to enhance future disclosures by providing sufficient clarity in the notes relating to the refinancing and to endeavour to improve the front-end commentary by creating a clearer picture of the gains/losses for the year. The company also agreed to disclose the information required by IAS 24, ‘Related Party Transactions’ in relation to this refinancing transaction in its next set of accounts. In addition, after reflecting on the usefulness of the realised and unrealised split, the company decided to remove this presentational distinction from its statement of comprehensive income in future accounts. |
| Entity | Mears Group PLC |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 December 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
Sale and leaseback transaction We requested further details about the sale and leaseback of properties during the year, effected through the partial disposal of a subsidiary, where the group also retained a 25% interest in the entity subject to the disposal. The company provided us with adequate explanations for the transaction and agreed to provide greater clarity for any similar transactions in the future. Contract liabilities We asked the company for further information about ‘gainshare’ payments due to customers and to clarify whether it had applied the variable consideration constraint in IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contract with Customers’ to these arrangements. The company provided the information requested, acknowledging that the gainshare liabilities did not meet the definition of a contract liability under IFRS 15 and undertook to present separately contract liabilities, gainshare and other customer-related liabilities in the comparative information in the notes to the 2025 annual report and accounts. |
| Entity | Mitie Group plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 March 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | BDO LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | Motability Operations Group plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 30 September 2024 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | KPMG LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
Insurance contracts We asked the company for further information about the judgement that had been made in relation to whether the insurance services that are included within lease arrangements with customers met the definition of an insurance contract under IFRS 17. The company provided additional explanations. In view of the specific nature of the company’s arrangements and the risk disclosures provided in the accounts we did not consider it proportionate to pursue this matter further. Measurement of the Provision for Insurance Claims Outstanding We asked the company for further information about how the Provision for Insurance Claims Outstanding was measured under IAS 37, which was provided. The company agreed that where a portion of the provision had previously been offset against a reimbursement asset, this would be presented gross in future annual reports and accounts. |
| Entity | Motorpoint Group Plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 March 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | No |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice | N/A |
| Entity | National Grid plc |
| Balance Sheet Date | 31 March 2025 |
| Exchange of Substantive Letters (1) | Yes |
| Scope of Review (2) | Full |
| Quarter Published | March 2026 |
| Auditor (5) | Deloitte LLP |
| Case Summary / Press Notice |
We asked the company to explain the apparent omission of tagged information from its 2025 annual financial report filed with the National Storage Mechanism, as required by the UK Listing Rules. The company acknowledged an oversight, which has since been rectified. |